How are the Tour de France climbs classified?
The Tour's race director explains to Rouleur exactly how the category of each of the race's climbs is determined
The climbs of the Tour de France are inscribed in cycling’s mythology. Over the decades, the mountains have played host to some of the sport’s most memorable moments, with the race often won and lost on their slopes. From the Alpine passes to the slight bumps in the road, each ascent is assigned a category that denotes its difficulty: fourth, third, second, first, and for the toughest of them all, hors catégorie (HC) – quite literally unclassifiable.
For aspirants to the King of the Mountains throne, the climbs are a hunting ground. Each ascent is ranked in order to allocate points to those vying for the polka dot jersey. Be the first over a fourth category climb and you’ll claim a single point. But beat your rivals to the summit of an HC mountain and you’ll add 20 points to your tally, double if the climb marks the stage finish.
Legend has it that the classifications were originally decided with a Citroën 2CV car, with the climb’s category judged to be the same as the gear necessary to motor up it. For Thierry Gouvenou, the Tour’s race director and the person responsible for designing the race route, that’s all nonsense.
>>> Tour de France 2022 route: everything you need to know about the stages of the 109th edition
“Perhaps the story came from a drunken night between journalists,” Gouvenou tells Rouleur. “In cycling we have so many stories like that that have been embellished over time. Maybe there’s some truth in it somewhere, but I’m not convinced.”
When it comes to classifying climbs, Gouvenou and his team at ASO rely on a simple mathematical formula. “Essentially, if we have a climb that isn’t so well known, we multiply the distance by the average gradient squared,” he says. “That gives us a number which then gives us a score.”
Read more: The hardest climbs of the Tour de France 2022
Let’s take, for example, Alpe d’Huez. With its 21 hairpins, the mountain stretches out 13.8km in length, at an average pitch of 8.1%. The sum therefore is 13.8 x (8.1 x 8.1), giving a score of 905.
Gouvenou and his team found that the following scores correspond to the long-established categories.
600+ points – hors catégorie
300-600 points – 1st category
150-300 points – 2nd category
75-150 points – 3rd category
Up to 75 points – 4th category
“I applied this [formula] to the Tour de France and went back over all the climbs about 15 years ago,” says Gouvenou. “As it turned out, most of what had been done over the years fit within this framework. There are exceptions of course, but for the most part, it matched up.”
Alpe d'Huez is one of the Tours classic HC climbs (Russell Ellis/SWPix)
When faced with a new ascent, Gouvenou and a handful of fellow former professional cyclists travel out to the climb to make an assessment with their own eyes. This is what happened in 2019, when the team headed to the Alps to see the newly paved Col de la Loze, which was set to make its Tour debut the following year.
“When we did the recon [of the Col de la Loze] in the car, we realised we had something exceptional in front of us,” Gouvenou says. Using his formula, the race director punched the numbers into his calculator and found that the climb scored a jaw-dropping 1300 points, more than twice the amount required for HC classification.
Today, the Col de la Loze stands as one of the highest ranking mountains the peloton has ever tackled, alongside the Col du Portet, Mont Ventoux, the Col de la Madeleine, and the Plateau de Beille.
Other factors to consider
It’s not all about mathematics, though. For climbs that aren’t as clear-cut as these towering peaks, Gouvenou and his team take a host of other details into account. One factor that helps them decide is the ascent’s placement within a stage. “The closer the climb is to the finish line, the greater the chance it will be bumped up a category,” says Gouvenou. “This doesn’t tend to happen with the big climbs, though. It’s mostly for the lesser-known ones.”
History plays a part, too. In fact, for Gouvenou, this is where the “subjective side” of climb classification really comes into play. “Climbs where there have been great battles, big cycling moments. That helps us to rank them.”
The iconic Col du Galibier is one such climb. First introduced to the Tour de France in 1911, the Galibier has two ascents, both of which will be tackled this July. On stage 11, the riders will take the tougher route heading south from Valloire, before taking the easier road up from Briançon the following day. Using ASO’s formula, the first ascent scores 843 points, while the second comes in at 598, two points shy of HC classification. Still, given the Galibier’s century-long love affair with the race and its dizzying height of 2,642m, the climb keeps its HC status in both directions.
The classification of climb is not solely based on mathematics (SWPix)
There’s also a lot of consideration given to the smaller foothills. “We sometimes classify climbs as fourth category that don’t really merit it,” says Gouvenou. “That’s a bit what has happened in Denmark [with this year’s route].”
The 2022 Grand Départ will take place in the flatlands of Scandinavia, where the riders will roll over six category four climbs before entering France for the first time. These short ascents barely meet the threshold for classification according to ASO’s formula, but, Gouvenou explains, they are classified to kickstart the polka dot jersey competition in the opening days of the race.
What’s clear is that, despite having a formula to rely on, the old-school approach has not been lost when categorising climbs. “We’re not strictly rigid with the classifications,” says Gouvenou. “The maths is really just to verify.”
Lead image by (Photo by Dario Belingheri/Getty Images)